Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: add an of_genirq driver
From: Hans J. Koch <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-14 23:02:18
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:00:22AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
quoted
quoted
For x86 it's not defined at all. But as this code is for the PowerPC,No, it isn't. What makes you say that? The Kconfig entry doesn't depend on PowerPC. I compiled it on x86...It depends on OF. You could compile on x86? Have to check that...
Ooops, forget it. It cannot be selected on x86. I was a bit distracted when I wrote that, sorry.
quoted
quoted
where using NO_IRQ seems still to be OK.No. uio_pdrv_genirq can be used on all platforms, and not all platforms have NO_IRQ. NO_IRQ can be used in platform specific code only.Well, the wrapper uses irq_of_parse_and_map(). So far, it returns NO_IRQ if an IRQ was not specified (or not found). I could check if there was an interrupt-property at all, so I can distinguish between 'not specified' and 'not found'. Then, UIO_IRQ_NONE would only be used, if there was none specified. Otherwise it will always be the result from irq_of_parse_and_map(), whatever that is (even NO_IRQ). Is this what you have in mind?
I would find it better if probe() failed if no irq is specified, printing a message that tells the user to setup his data correctly before loading the driver. A user _has_ to setup irq, if there is none, he still has to set irq=UIO_IRQ_NONE. For that matter, 'not specified' and 'not found' is both the same bad thing. Thanks, Hans
Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |