Re: [PATCH net-next] [RESEND] wireguard: disable in FIPS mode
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: 2021-04-09 02:44:52
Also in:
netdev
Hi Hangbin, On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:41 PM Hangbin Liu [off-list ref] wrote:
I agree that the best way is to disable the crypto modules in FIPS mode.
But the code in lib/crypto looks not the same with crypto/. For modules
in crypto, there is an alg_test() to check if the crytpo is FIPS allowed
when do register.
- crypto_register_alg()
- crypto_wait_for_test()
- crypto_probing_notify(CRYPTO_MSG_ALG_REGISTER, larval->adult)
- cryptomgr_schedule_test()
- cryptomgr_test()
- alg_test()
But in lib/crypto the code are more like a library. We can call it anytime
and there is no register. Maybe we should add a similar check in lib/crypto.
But I'm not familiar with crypto code... Not sure if anyone in linux-crypto@
would like help do that.Since it's just a normal module library, you can simply do this in the module_init function, rather than deep within registration abstractions.
quoted
diff --git a/lib/crypto/curve25519.c b/lib/crypto/curve25519.c index 288a62cd29b2..b794f49c291a 100644 --- a/lib/crypto/curve25519.c +++ b/lib/crypto/curve25519.c@@ -12,11 +12,15 @@ #include <crypto/curve25519.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/fips.h> bool curve25519_selftest(void); static int __init mod_init(void) { + if (!fips_enabled) + return -EOPNOTSUPP;Question here, why it is !fips_enabled? Shouldn't we return error when fips_enabled?
Er, just not thinking straight today. `if (fips_enabled)` is probably what you want indeed. Jason