Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 7 authors, 2021-04-12

Re: [PATCH net-next] [RESEND] wireguard: disable in FIPS mode

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: 2021-04-09 02:44:52
Also in: netdev

Hi Hangbin,

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:41 PM Hangbin Liu [off-list ref] wrote:
I agree that the best way is to disable the crypto modules in FIPS mode.
But the code in lib/crypto looks not the same with crypto/. For modules
in crypto, there is an alg_test() to check if the crytpo is FIPS allowed
when do register.

- crypto_register_alg()
  - crypto_wait_for_test()
    - crypto_probing_notify(CRYPTO_MSG_ALG_REGISTER, larval->adult)
      - cryptomgr_schedule_test()
        - cryptomgr_test()
          - alg_test()

But in lib/crypto the code are more like a library. We can call it anytime
and there is no register. Maybe we should add a similar check in lib/crypto.
But I'm not familiar with crypto code... Not sure if anyone in linux-crypto@
would like help do that.
Since it's just a normal module library, you can simply do this in the
module_init function, rather than deep within registration
abstractions.
quoted
diff --git a/lib/crypto/curve25519.c b/lib/crypto/curve25519.c
index 288a62cd29b2..b794f49c291a 100644
--- a/lib/crypto/curve25519.c
+++ b/lib/crypto/curve25519.c
@@ -12,11 +12,15 @@
 #include <crypto/curve25519.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/fips.h>

 bool curve25519_selftest(void);

 static int __init mod_init(void)
 {
+ if (!fips_enabled)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Question here, why it is !fips_enabled? Shouldn't we return error when
fips_enabled?
Er, just not thinking straight today. `if (fips_enabled)` is probably
what you want indeed.

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help