Compiling the talitos driver with my GCC 4.3.1 e500v2 cross-compiler
resulted in a failed build due to the anonymous union/structures
introduced in this commit:

  crypto: talitos - enhanced talitos_desc struct for SEC1

The build error was:

  drivers/crypto/talitos.h:56: error: unknown field 'len' specified in initializer
  drivers/crypto/talitos.h:56: warning: missing braces around initializer
  drivers/crypto/talitos.h:56: warning: (near initialization for 'zero_entry.<anonymous>')
  drivers/crypto/talitos.h:57: error: unknown field 'j_extent' specified in initializer
  drivers/crypto/talitos.h:58: error: unknown field 'eptr' specified in initializer
  drivers/crypto/talitos.h:58: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
  drivers/crypto/talitos.h:58: warning: (near initialization for 'zero_entry')
  make[2]: *** [drivers/crypto/talitos.o] Error 1
  make[1]: *** [drivers/crypto] Error 2
  make: *** [drivers] Error 2

This patch eliminates the errors by relying on the C standard's
implicit assignment of zero to static variables.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <redacted>
---
 drivers/crypto/talitos.h | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/talitos.h b/drivers/crypto/talitos.h
index 314daf5..163cfe7 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/talitos.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/talitos.h

@@ -52,12 +52,7 @@ struct talitos_ptr {
 	__be32 ptr;     /* address */
 };
 
-static const struct talitos_ptr zero_entry = {
-	.len = 0,
-	.j_extent = 0,
-	.eptr = 0,
-	.ptr = 0
-};
+static const struct talitos_ptr zero_entry;
 
 /* descriptor */
 struct talitos_desc {

-- 
1.9.1