On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:

Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2015, 21:38:02 schrieb Herbert Xu:

Hi Herbert,

quoted

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 12:19:53PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:

quoted

All GCM implementations available on recent Intel systems successfully
tested (i.e NX and CAAM not tested).

Just to clarify: from a caller's perspective, using
seqniv(rfc4106(gcm(aes))) is still the right invocation? Or shall I now
use seqiv?

You should use seqiv from now on.  But I should update the patches
so that seqniv is not visible to user-space.

In this case, wouldn't xfrm_algo.c need to be changed too?

I will change it once the conversion is complete.  For now seqniv
is identical to seqiv for kernel users so it'll continue to work.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt