Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2015, 21:38:02 schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 12:19:53PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
quoted
All GCM implementations available on recent Intel systems successfully
tested (i.e NX and CAAM not tested).
Just to clarify: from a caller's perspective, using
seqniv(rfc4106(gcm(aes))) is still the right invocation? Or shall I now
use seqiv?
You should use seqiv from now on. But I should update the patches
so that seqniv is not visible to user-space.
In this case, wouldn't xfrm_algo.c need to be changed too?
Cheers,
Ciao
Stephan