On 08/09/2012 01:21 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
I've found something confusing when I wanted to use more than one
It's not confusing, it's a bug. Good catch.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
sja1000 attached to a platform bus with interrupt sharing. The flag for
the sja1000 resources I wanted to set first was the
IORESOURCE_IRQ_SHAREABLE* flag because of the other IORESOURCE_IRQ_XXX
flags. But this flag is ignored by the sja1000_platform driver because
it has another position. If I use the generic IRQF_SHARED** flag
everything works fine. Does it make sense to patch the driver in a way
like that:
--- linux-3.5/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_platform.c.orig
2012-08-09 10:38:57.405381025 +0200
+++ linux-3.5/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_platform.c
2012-08-09 10:57:22.693364557 +0200
@@ -109,6 +109,8 @@
priv = netdev_priv(dev);
dev->irq = res_irq->start;
+ if(res_irq->flags & IORESOURCE_IRQ_SHAREABLE)
+ priv->irq_flags |= IRQF_SHARED;
Please adjust to kernel coding style, space between if and opening bracket.
priv->irq_flags = res_irq->flags & (IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK |
IRQF_SHARED);
Please remove the IRQF_SHARED here, as IRQF_SHARED is wrong here and
means something different.
priv->reg_base = addr;
/* The CAN clock frequency is half the oscillator clock
frequency */
If you have a look at the history of the file, it shows that this flag
was added Yegor Yefremov [off-list ref] in commit
abde89d can: sja1000: allow shared interrupt definition
Please resend your patch, with the problems fixed, use git send-email
for this, add Yegor on Cc and Sign your work [1]. If this is too
complicated for you, I'll fix it myself.
Marc
[1]
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#L298
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |