On 21/05/14 01:28PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 03:58:40PM +0530, riteshh wrote:
quoted
On 21/05/14 07:56AM, riteshh wrote:
quoted
On 21/05/14 09:41AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
If it helps, I tested "-g quick" on PPC64 with 64k config for 1-13 patches of
this patch series and didn't find any regression/crash with xfstests.
I am running "-g auto" now, will let you know the results once it completes.
I tested these patches (1-13) with "-g auto" config and I didn't see any
regression/crashes on PPC64 platform.
Yes it helps, thanks for testing. You could also let the fstests run in
a loop or with different memory/cpu setup, this can catch some races.
Oh yes, sure. Earlier I wanted to complete one round of testing of this auto
test, as auto tests take some good time to complete.
Later I can keep your suggested method to tests in a loop for this full patch
series from Qu.
Thanks
ritesh