Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: send: fix invalid commands for inodes with changed type but same gen
From: Roman Anasal | BDSU <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-11 20:54:06
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 22:30 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
11.01.2021 22:02, Roman Anasal пишет:quoted
When doing a send, if a new inode has the same number as an inode in the parent subvolume it will only be detected as to be recreated when the genrations differ. But with inodes in the same generation the emitted commands will cause the receiver to fail. This case does not happen when doing incremental sends with snapshots that are kept read-only by the user all the time, but it may happen if - a snapshot was modified after it was created - the subvol used as parent was created independently from the sent subvol Example reproducers: # case 1: same ino at same path btrfs subvolume create subvol1 btrfs subvolume create subvol2 mkdir subvol1/a touch subvol2/aWhat happens in case of echo foo > subvol1/a echo bar > subvol2/a ?
`echo foo > subvol1/a` wouldn't work since subvol1/a is a directory. However, replacing both preceding lines with: mkdir subvol1/a echo bar > subvol2/a => same as before with/without the patch, plus an additional write command for the content And with both lines as echo foo > subvol1/a echo bar > subvol2/a => produces an invalid stream (with and without this patch) with a `link a -> a` followed by `unlink a` as seen in the example output quoted further below. So there is another bug here. The conditions for this seem to roughly be: changed/new inode with same number, type and generation, since reordering the commands so the inodes have different generations produces a valid stream. Changing the name to subvol2/b like in the second case below produces a valid stream with a `link b -> a` followed by `unlink a`. I'll take a look into this, too, and if possible provide another patch for that case.
quoted
btrfs property set subvol1 ro true btrfs property set subvol2 ro true btrfs send -p subvol1 subvol2 | btrfs receive --dump The produced tree state here is: |-- subvol1 | `-- a/ (ino 257) | `-- subvol2 `-- a (ino 257) Where subvol1/a/ is a directory and subvol2/a is a file with the same inode number and same generation. Example output of the receive command: At subvol subvol2 snapshot ./subvol2 uuid=19d2be0a- 5af1-fa44-9b3f-f21815178d00 transid=9 parent_uuid=1bac8b12-ddb2- 6441-8551-700456991785 parent_transid=9 utimes ./subvol2/ atime=2021-01- 11T13:41:36+0000 mtime=2021-01-11T13:41:36+0000 ctime=2021-01- 11T13:41:36+0000 link ./subvol2/a dest=a unlink ./subvol2/a utimes ./subvol2/ atime=2021-01- 11T13:41:36+0000 mtime=2021-01-11T13:41:36+0000 ctime=2021-01- 11T13:41:36+0000 chmod ./subvol2/a mode=644 utimes ./subvol2/a atime=2021-01- 11T13:41:36+0000 mtime=2021-01-11T13:41:36+0000 ctime=2021-01- 11T13:41:36+0000 => the `link` command causes the receiver to fail with: ERROR: link a -> a failed: File exists Second example: # case 2: same ino at different path btrfs subvolume create subvol1 btrfs subvolume create subvol2 mkdir subvol1/a touch subvol2/b btrfs property set subvol1 ro true btrfs property set subvol2 ro true btrfs send -p subvol1 subvol2 | btrfs receive --dump The produced tree state here is: |-- subvol1 | `-- a/ (ino 257) | `-- subvol2 `-- b (ino 257) Where subvol1/a/ is a directory and subvol2/b is a file with the same inode number and same generation. Example output of the receive command: At subvol subvol2 snapshot ./subvol2 uuid=ea93c47a- 5f47-724f-8a43-e15ce745aef0 transid=20 parent_uuid=f03578ef-5bca- 1445-a480-3df63677fddf parent_transid=20 utimes ./subvol2/ atime=2021-01- 11T13:58:00+0000 mtime=2021-01-11T13:58:00+0000 ctime=2021-01- 11T13:58:00+0000 link ./subvol2/b dest=a unlink ./subvol2/a utimes ./subvol2/ atime=2021-01- 11T13:58:00+0000 mtime=2021-01-11T13:58:00+0000 ctime=2021-01- 11T13:58:00+0000 chmod ./subvol2/b mode=644 utimes ./subvol2/b atime=2021-01- 11T13:58:00+0000 mtime=2021-01-11T13:58:00+0000 ctime=2021-01- 11T13:58:00+0000 => the `link` command causes the receiver to fail with: ERROR: link b -> a failed: Operation not permitted Signed-off-by: Roman Anasal <redacted>