Thread (44 messages) 44 messages, 15 authors, 2017-09-10

Re: netapp-alike snapshots?

From: A L <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-22 17:19:12

Perhaps using a bind mount? It would look and work the same as a ordinary fs. Just need to make sure du uses one filesystem.

---- From: Ulli Horlacher [off-list ref] -- Sent: 2017-08-22 - 18:57 ----
On Tue 2017-08-22 (21:45), Roman Mamedov wrote:
quoted
It is beneficial to not have snapshots in-place. With a local directory of
snapshots, issuing things like "find", "grep -r" or even "du" will take an
inordinate amount of time and will produce a result you do not expect.
Netapp snapshots are invisible for tools doing opendir()/readdir()
One could simulate this with symlinks for the snapshot directory:
store the snapshot elsewhere (not inplace) and create a symlink to it, in
every directory.

quoted
Personally I prefer to have a /snapshots directory on every FS
My users want the snapshots locally in a .snapshot subdirectory.
Because Netapp do it this way - for at least 20 years and we have a
multi-PB Netapp storage environment.
No chance to change this.

-- 
Ullrich Horlacher              Server und Virtualisierung
Rechenzentrum TIK         
Universitaet Stuttgart         E-Mail: horlacher@tik.uni-stuttgart.de
Allmandring 30a                Tel:    ++49-711-68565868
70569 Stuttgart (Germany)      WWW:    http://www.tik.uni-stuttgart.de/
REF:<20170822214531.44538589@natsu>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help