Re: [PATCH 17/29] btrfs: remove unused parameter from extent_write_cache_pages
From: Liu Bo <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-14 19:36:07
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:34:13AM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The 'tree' was used to call locking hook that does not exist anymore. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index f683fa5a4b91..22a2f2fa62c7 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c@@ -3916,8 +3916,7 @@ int btree_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping, * WB_SYNC_ALL then we were called for data integrity and we must wait for * existing IO to complete. */ -static int extent_write_cache_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree, - struct address_space *mapping, +static int extent_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc, writepage_t writepage, void *data, void (*flush_fn)(void *))@@ -4158,8 +4157,7 @@ int extent_writepages(struct extent_io_tree *tree, .bio_flags = 0, }; - ret = extent_write_cache_pages(tree, mapping, wbc, - __extent_writepage, &epd, + ret = extent_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, __extent_writepage, &epd, flush_write_bio);
Are we going to leave {btrfs,extent}_{read,write}pages untouched?
Thanks,
-liubo
flush_epd_write_bio(&epd); return ret; -- 2.10.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html