Re: btrfs receive leaves new subvolume modifiable during operation
From: Austin S. Hemmelgarn <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-03 19:37:28
From: Austin S. Hemmelgarn <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-03 19:37:28
On 2017-02-03 14:17, Graham Cobb wrote:
On 03/02/17 16:01, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:quoted
Ironically, I ended up having time sooner than I thought. The message doesn't appear to be in any of the archives yet, but the message ID is: [ref]Ah. I didn't notice it until after I had sent my message.
No worries.
quoted
I actually like how you explained things a bit better though, so if you are OK with it I'll update the patch I sent using your description (and credit you in the commit message too of course).You are welcome to use any of my phrasing or approach, of course!
I'll send out the new version shortly then.