Re: btrfs receive leaves new subvolume modifiable during operation
From: Graham Cobb <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-03 19:17:07
From: Graham Cobb <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-03 19:17:07
On 03/02/17 16:01, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
Ironically, I ended up having time sooner than I thought. The message doesn't appear to be in any of the archives yet, but the message ID is: [ref]
Ah. I didn't notice it until after I had sent my message.
I actually like how you explained things a bit better though, so if you are OK with it I'll update the patch I sent using your description (and credit you in the commit message too of course).
You are welcome to use any of my phrasing or approach, of course!