Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack

[btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Pascal Junod <hidden> · 2012-12-13
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2012-12-13
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · David Sterba <hidden> · 2012-12-13
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2012-12-13
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2012-12-14
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Pascal Junod <hidden> · 2012-12-14

From: Pascal Junod <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-14 16:42:01

Le 14.12.12 15:29, Chris Mason a écrit :

Ok, I think what was happening on Pascal's machine is that we are
returning -EOVERFLOW and sometimes aborting the transaction (which turns
the FS readonly).

I have that fixed here.  Rename I'm reodering the rename code a little
bit to also handle the case where there are collisions on rename.

Please tell me if I can help by explaining more about my setup.

Pascal

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help