Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack

[btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Pascal Junod <hidden> · 2012-12-13
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2012-12-13
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · David Sterba <hidden> · 2012-12-13
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2012-12-13
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Chris Mason <hidden> · 2012-12-14
Re: [btrfs] is vulnerable to a hash-DoS attack · Pascal Junod <hidden> · 2012-12-14

From: David Sterba <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-13 21:34:35

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:52:08PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:

Thanks for taking the time to write this up.  As far as I can tell, the
looping was actually fixed in an older kernel and I just misread our
version string in your original email.

Yeah, the blogpost says 3.3.7. I did a quick test with 3.7 and was not
able to reproduce it.

david

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help