On 16/01/2026 17:41, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 05:08:58PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On 16/01/2026 16:18, Jeff Johnson wrote:

quoted

On 1/15/2026 11:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On 15/01/2026 23:30, Jeff Johnson wrote:

quoted

On 1/5/2026 5:01 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

quoted

The WCN39xx family of WiFi/BT chips incorporates a simple PMU, spreading
voltages over internal rails. Implement support for using powersequencer
for this family of ATH10k devices in addition to using regulators.

Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.h |  2 ++

My automation flagged:
* drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c has no QTI copyright
* drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.h has no QTI copyright
* 2 copyright issues

I'll add these manually in my 'pending' branch

And why is this a problem? You are not here to impose Qualcomm rules, bu
care about Linux kernel. You cannot add copyrights based on what exactly?

I am a maintainer that is paid by Qualcomm to perform that role, and hence I
have a duty to enforce the legal guidance from Qualcomm when it comes to
contributions from other Qualcomm employees.

No, it's not your duty to enforce rules from some other departments or
business units. Especially not without agreement of that person. You
cannot just add copyrights to other people's commits just because you
think that such copyrights should be there. Only the copyright owner -
which you did not identify here and email address of contributor does
not imply that (you don't even know what work contract a person has) -
can add such copyrights.

In this particular usecase Jeff has enough knowledge about me and my
working place. I will have to resend the series anyway, but otherwise it
was perfectly fine for him to correct the copyright.

Fine, but please do not add copyrights yourself to any of my code. It's
fine to point is a reviewing comment and expect clarifications on my
side, I don't find changing people's code and adding there copyrights as
right way.

Best regards,
Krzysztof