Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add the Asus TF103C to the bcm_broken_irq_dmi_table
From: Hans de Goede <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-19 20:32:58
Hi Marcel, On 1/19/22 20:39, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Hans,quoted
quoted
quoted
The DSDT for the Asus TF103C specifies a IOAPIC IRQ for the HCI -> host IRQ but this is not correct. Unlike the previous entries in the table, this time the correct GPIO to use instead is known; and the TF103C is battery powered making runtime-pm support more important. Extend the bcm_broken_irq_dmi_table mechanism to allow specifying the right GPIO instead of just always disabling runtime-pm and add an entry to it for the Asus TF103C. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <redacted> --- drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c index ef54afa29357..c6ac4aa994af 100644 --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h> #include <linux/tty.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/dmi.h>@@ -870,7 +871,23 @@ static int bcm_resume(struct device *dev)#endif /* Some firmware reports an IRQ which does not work (wrong pin in fw table?) */ +static struct gpiod_lookup_table asus_tf103c_irq_gpios = { + .dev_id = "serial0-0",do you need this one? I assume it could be easily enumerated as serial1-0 if you are unlucky.Yes there can be multiple global gpiod_lookup_table-s registered and the gpiolib code finds the one to use be matching this field to the dev_name() for the device passed to gpiod_get(). I'm not worried about this getting enumerated with another dev_name(), this is a tablet with no ways to add extra serial-bus devices and there is only the 1 serial-bus device.is there no other way to match this device?
I'm not sure what you mean ny "matching this device" ? Since the ACPI tables on this tablet contain the wrong GPIO, we need a gpio-lookup table override and the gpio cores checks for a lookup table to use with a specific struct device * based on dev_name() and only based on that, there are no other matching options in the gpio-lookup mechanism. Regards, Hans