Re: [RFC] Bluetooth: hci_sock: Fix calling lock_sock when handling HCI_DEV_UNREG
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-07-18 06:51:53
Hi Tetsuo, On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 11:22 PM Tetsuo Handa [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2021/07/18 14:16, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:quoted
Anyway after all these discussion Im even more convinced that the real problem lies in hci_dev_get/hold, after all references are usually used to prevent the objects to be freed but in this case it doesn't and no locking will gonna fix that.If hci_dev_hold() calls atomic_long_add_unless(&file->f_count, 1, 0) under RCU, vhci_release(file) would not be called until all sockets using that hdev drops the reference, and hci_sock_dev_event(hdev, HCI_DEV_UNREG) no longer needs to traverse sockets on hci_sk_list.head list. This requires adding "struct file *" to "struct hci_dev". My patch keeps changes be confined to only hci_sock_dev_event().
Being confined doesn't mean that it simple, your changes are doing a loop locking, and I also didn't touch hci_dev_hold because it would affect all drivers but if there is a way to do it by all means we should do it, but notice that we do need a way to cleanup if the device is unregistered so I don't think holding the file directly would be a good idea since it prevents release but it would also prevent cleanup, in other words if the process which open the vhci terminates or close, all bluetooth sockets should receive a proper error so we cannot really change this behavior. From the brief look at it I think we should remove the function hci_dev_free and leave hci_dev_unregister to cleanup everything, but I'm afraid there could be extra references that are not being cleanup properly and finding out where could take a lot more time, well even with your suggestion that could be a problem since we also would need to inspect every time we hold a reference in the same manner. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz