RE: [cryptodev:master 79/79] (.text+0x330de0): multiple definition of `ecdh_shared_secret'

-----Original Message-----
From: Herbert Xu [mailto:herbert@gondor.apana.org.au]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 7:45 AM
To: Benedetto, Salvatore <redacted>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; Wu, Fengguang
[off-list ref]; linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [cryptodev:master 79/79] (.text+0x330de0): multiple definition
of `ecdh_shared_secret'

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:36:44AM +0100, Salvatore Benedetto wrote:

quoted

The patch was based on the current tree. I just pulled.
There is not point in moving to lib because bluetooth is about to be
converted to kpp.
That patch I believe will go up the bluetooth tree, so my suggestion
is to simply accept that I fail to properly name that symbol.

Renaming the symbol in net/bluetooth/ecc which I think will conflict
with the patch where I remove it completely which, again, I believe
will go up the BT tree.

OK I will have no option but to revert your patches then.

Please revert the last one only and I'll resend it with the symbol
name fixed. I don't see why you should revert all of them.

I also just sent the BT patch which was changing the symbol name
anyway.

Regards,
Salvatore