Re: Doing crypto in small stack buffers (bluetooth vs vmalloc-stack crash, etc)
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2016-06-22 23:46:10
Also in:
linux-crypto, lkml
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Herbert Xu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:40AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:quoted
Is there a straightforward way that bluetooth and, potentially, other drivers can just do synchronous crypto in a small buffer specified by its virtual address? The actual cryptography part of the crypto code already works this way, but I can't find an API for it.Yes, single block users should use crypto_cipher_encrypt_one, an example would be drivers/md/dm-crypt.c.Aha! I expected something like that to exist, but I couldn't find it. I'll change the two offenders I've found so far to use it.Before I do this, can you explain what the difference is between crypto_cipher and crypto_skcipher? net/bluetooth/smp.c currently uses crypto_alloc_skcipher, which you added in: commit 71af2f6bb22a4bf42663e10f1d8913d4967ed07f Author: Herbert Xu [off-list ref] Date: Sun Jan 24 21:18:30 2016 +0800 Bluetooth: Use skcipher and hash Am I just supposed to replace "skcipher" with "cipher" everywhere?
It looks like I'm supposed to that and to use "aes" instead of "ebc(aes)". *However*, the other offender I've found (net/rxrpc/rxkad.c) uses "pcbc(fcrypt)", which doesn't appear to be usable with this API. Is there no way to say "I want synchronous crypto on this VA range" using the skcipher API? --Andy -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC