[PATCH 0/2] Regression fixes for rfcomm/tty.c · Gianluca Anzolin <hidden> · 2014-01-04
[PATCH 1/2] rfcomm: release the port when the last user closes the tty · Gianluca Anzolin <hidden> · 2014-01-04
[PATCH 2/2] rfcomm: move the device under its parent if already connected · Gianluca Anzolin <hidden> · 2014-01-04
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Regression fixes for rfcomm/tty.c · Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> · 2014-01-06
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Regression fixes for rfcomm/tty.c · Gianluca Anzolin <hidden> · 2014-01-06
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Regression fixes for rfcomm/tty.c · Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> · 2014-01-06

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Regression fixes for rfcomm/tty.c

From: Gianluca Anzolin <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-06 17:42:34

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:35:18AM -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

Hi Gianluca,

I applied both patches to bluetooth-next to expose them wider testing. I like to have them go through bluetooth-next first before we push them back into -stable.

Regards

Marcel

Thank you for the reply, however there is another regression and the fix would
make the second patch unnecessary.

Would it be better if I resend a second iteration of patches? There would be 4
patches, two fixes and two which move code around.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help