[RFC v2 0/2] SSP MITM protection for General Bonding

From: Mikel Astiz <redacted>

I'm reworking Timo's patch originally submitted as "[RFC] Bluetooth: Fix missing MITM protection when being responding LM".

The proposal is to use MITM protection for General Bonding exactly as for Dedicated Bonding (patch 2/2). I can't think of any reason why the current implementation has different policies, leading to not using MITM protection for General Bonding even if the I/O capabilities make it possible.

The proposal is therefore to make both bonding types equal.

Another alternative would be to toggle this behavior through a mgmt API setting.

Mikel Astiz (1):
  Bluetooth: Use defines instead of integer literals

Timo Mueller (1):
  Bluetooth: Use MITM protection when responding LM

 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.4