Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 2 authors, 2012-10-04

Re: [PATCH v2 resend 1/2] Introduced a load_firmware callback to struct hci_dev

From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Date: 2012-10-04 10:01:37

Hi Jesse,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
load_firmware will be called at the end of hci_dev_open() if it
is defined.

Signed-off-by: Wen-chien Jesse Sung <redacted>
---
 include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |    1 +
 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c         |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
index 593cd1d..40972a3 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
@@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct hci_dev {
 	int (*send)(struct sk_buff *skb);
 	void (*notify)(struct hci_dev *hdev, unsigned int evt);
 	int (*ioctl)(struct hci_dev *hdev, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
+	void (*load_firmware)(struct hci_dev *hdev);
 };
 
 struct hci_conn {
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
index d4de5db..49be87a 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
@@ -725,6 +725,8 @@ int hci_dev_open(__u16 dev)
 done:
 	hci_req_unlock(hdev);
 	hci_dev_put(hdev);
+	if (!ret && hdev->load_firmware)
+		hdev->load_firmware(hdev);
 	return ret;
 }
 
has anybody thought this through actually? Do we need to reload the
firmware after every HCI_Reset? Since hci_dev_open() is used at least
twice during normal operation. And for every RFKILL or power down/up
cycle of the chip.

And there is an internal process of hci_dev_open() trigger on
registration and others triggered by hciconfig hci0 up. I am pretty much
against having to wait for all this firmware loading crap during every
bring up of the device. Especially since it always does a trip via
request_firmware().

Regards

Marcel

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help