Re: [PATCH 02/10] battery: Implement Generic device battery

Anderson,

On 09/12/2012 01:57 PM, Anderson Lizardo wrote:

Hi Chen,

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Chen Ganir [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

Both BtIO and GAttrib intend to mimic GLib-like libraries where this is
the convention. The plan is not to let this spread to the entire code
base (particularly with the likely move to libell in the long run), so
please don't use CamelCase.

Ok. So for the battery options i'll simply change it to battery_option. What
about the convention for defining a function pointer ?

See the result of:

grep -r 'typedef.*(' *

on your bluez tree. As Johan mentioned, you should ignore the (few)
occurrences of camel case typedef declarations.

Regards,

Thanks.

-- 
BR,
Chen Ganir