---
plugins/messages-dummy.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/plugins/messages-dummy.c b/plugins/messages-dummy.c
index 00cca59..97c0682 100644
--- a/plugins/messages-dummy.c
+++ b/plugins/messages-dummy.c
@@ -52,6 +52,36 @@ struct folder_listing_data {
void *user_data;
};
+/* NOTE: Neither IrOBEX nor MAP specs says that folder listing needs to
+ * be sorted (in IrOBEX examples it is not). However existing implementations
+ * seem to follow the fig. 3-2 from MAP specification v1.0, and I've seen a
+ * test suite requiring folder listing to be in that order.
+ */
+static gint folder_names_cmp(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b,
+ gpointer user_data)
+{
+ static const char *order[] = {
+ "inbox", "outbox", "sent", "deleted", "draft", NULL
+ };
+ struct session *session = user_data;
+ int ia, ib;
+
+ if (g_strcmp0(session->cwd, "telecom/msg") == 0) {
+ for (ia = 0; order[ia]; ++ia) {
+ if (g_strcmp0(a, order[ia]) == 0)
+ break;
+ }
+ for (ib = 0; order[ib]; ++ib) {
+ if (g_strcmp0(b, order[ib]) == 0)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (ia != ib)
+ return ia - ib;
+ }
+
+ return g_strcmp0(a, b);
+}
+
static char *get_next_subdir(DIR *dp, char *path)
{
struct dirent *ep;@@ -113,6 +143,8 @@ static ssize_t get_subdirs(struct folder_listing_data *fld, GSList **list)
closedir(dp);
g_free(path);
+ *list = g_slist_sort_with_data(*list, folder_names_cmp, fld->session);
+
return n;
}
--
1.7.4.1