Hi Padovan :
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
I would say something similar in style
to what I have done for the older CSR chips. See workaround above=
.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
And on that note, you could use data->udev to get the usb_device
struct ;)
As to this point, since now we are not using the btusb to download=
the
quoted
quoted
patch and radio table,
quoted
I think we do not need to alloc the data struct and use data->udev
before
quoted
quoted
the workaround.
quoted
So I'll still keep it was. How do you think it ?
No, there is no extra allocation. data->udev is already there. Just u=
se it as
quoted
quoted
Marcel said.
There is somehow different with the older CSR chips.
We need to return -NODEV directly if the bcd version of the 3012 chip i=
s
lower or equal to 0x0001,
quoted
And I think in such "return -NODEV" case, we totally do not need to all=
oc
the btusb_data.
=20
Ah yes, you right, I misread the patch.
=20
I have re-sent the patch to the mail list.
Btw, I changed the subject of the PATCH to make it be less than 60 characte=
rs.
Thanks, Padovan,
Steven,