Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix hidp disconnect deadlock
From: Gustavo F. Padovan <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-30 17:47:33
* Ilia, Kolominsky [off-list ref] [2011-06-30 16:55:52 +0200]:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Peter Hurley [mailto:peter@hurleysoftware.com] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 5:35 PM To: Gustavo F. Padovan Cc: Ilia, Kolominsky; linux-bluetooth Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix hidp disconnect deadlock On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:52 -0400, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:quoted
* Gustavo F. Padovan [off-list ref] [2011-06-29 17:24:56 -0300]:quoted
quoted
* Ilia, Kolominsky [off-list ref] [2011-06-26 09:16:58 +0200]:quoted
Hi! IMHO the fix isnt good due to possible race condition which will destroy session/task objects - either by a call tokthread_stopquoted
quoted
quoted
from the timer func or reentry to hidp_del_connection() on smp platforms.....quoted
This should fix the timer issue. Please test. GustavoHi Ilia & Gustavo, After Ilia pointed out the problem with the timer function, I went back and reviewed *all* the synchronization code relevant to the hid session thread. A number of problems were introduced with commit aabf6f89 - when the session thread was converted from a kernel_thread to a kthread. Although a kthread is a better choice for representing the session thread, the naive conversion of atomic/wakeup to kthread_stop() was inappropriate. kthread_stop() has usage semantics that different significantly from atomic/wakeup. As we already know, because kthread_stop() blocks on thread completion, it can introduce deadlocks in code that already uses exclusion mechanisms. Even with Ilia's new patch, consider the following sequence: Thread 0 Thread 1 Thread 2 in hidp_del_connection in hidp session claim r/w sem . timer triggers . kthread_stop() --------->. *blocks on thread 2* exits loop *blocks for r/wGuys, as far as I know - it is not possible to use kthread_stop from The timer func - since it may sleep and we are in soft_irq... What I did is added kthread_stop_async in the kthread use it in both Timer func and hidp_del_connection(). I am still polishing the code though...
Yes, you right, we really can't call kthread_stop there.
Gustavo, is adding the new api to kthread feasible? How to upstream such change?
I don't know the kthread internals to tell you if this is feasible or not. You have to send the patch to the maintainer of kthread (./scripts/get_maintainer.pl tells you the maintainer) and explain why you need this to him. But we also need a solution in the short term, this week, in order to fix this in the up coming 3.0 release. Gustavo