Thread (8 messages) read the whole thread 8 messages, 3 authors, 2009-08-26
  • sniff mode · Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com> · 2009-08-24
  • Re: sniff mode · Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> · 2009-08-24
  • Re: sniff mode · Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com> · 2009-08-24
  • Re: sniff mode · Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> · 2009-08-24
  • Re: sniff mode · Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com> · 2009-08-24
  • Re: sniff mode · Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> · 2009-08-24
  • Re: sniff mode · Ville Tervo <hidden> · 2009-08-26
  • Re: sniff mode · Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> · 2009-08-26

Re: sniff mode

From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Date: 2009-08-24 20:58:22

Hi Marcel,

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Marcel Holtmann[off-list ref] wrote=
:
quoted
It really seems the opposite, like we were disabling the automatic
active mode since this make us to always hit goto timer; while in
sniff mode. Perhaps this is meant for when remote device has been
controlling modes, which sound strange to me since hci_mode_change_evt
is called even when the we actively change the mode, right?
(hci_conn_idle does that)
I am not following.
Perhaps it is just me, but I don't see any attempt to detect which
part has initiated the connection, so regardless of who has been the
initiator, on any mode change different than active we will reset the
power_save to 0 which will prevent any attempt to leave sniff mode.

--=20
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Engenheiro de Computa=E7=E3o
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help