Re: AddCablePairedDevice (was Re: [PATCHes] Add sixpair)

On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 23:44 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

Hi Bastien,
=20

quoted

quoted

We could solve the data loss, and update problem by having an interna=

l,

quoted

quoted

root only, dbus method available for cable pairing of that sort. For
example, on org.bluez.Adapter:
void AddCablePairedDevice (string name,
                           string address,
                           unsigned int vendor_id,
                           unsigned int product_id,
                           string pnp_record);
=20
The function would just need to do all the storage work sixpair
currently does, and create the device internally similarly to
create_stored_device_from_profiles().

=20
Patch to do that attached.
=20
After setting the master bdaddr on the sixaxis using sixpair, I ran:
dbus-send --system --type=3Dmethod_call --print-reply --dest=3D"org.blu=

ez" /org/bluez/11043/hci0 org.bluez.Adapter.AddCablePairedDevice string:Foo=
bar string:00:19:C1:61:D6:62 uint32:0x054c uint32:0x0268 string:36019209000=
00A000100000900013503191124090004350D35061901000900113503190011090006350909=
656E09006A0901000900093508350619112409010009000D350F350D3506190100090013350=
31900110901002513576972656C65737320436F6E74726F6C6C65720901012513576972656C=
65737320436F6E74726F6C6C6572090102251B536F6E7920436F6D707574657220456E74657=
27461696E6D656E740902000901000902010901000902020800090203082109020428010902=
052801090206359A35980822259405010904A101A102850175089501150026FF00810375019=
513150025013500450105091901291381027501950D0600FF8103150026FF0005010901A100=
75089504350046FF0009300931093209358102C005017508952709018102750895300901910=
2750895300901B102C0A1028502750895300901B102C0A10285EE750895300901B102C0A102=
85EF750895300901B102C0C0090207350835060904090901000902082800090209280109020=
A280109020B09010009020C093E8009020D280009020E2800

quoted

=20
Which created the device in bluez. I'd leave it up to sixpair to remove
the device from other adapters, and setting the device as trusted
(though this didn't seem necessary for the pad to work).

=20
can this be made a little bit more generic. For example Bluetooth 2.1
has the out-of-band (OOB) ways for Simple Pairing and if we can design
something generic here that would help a lot.

What does it need for SP to work?