On Thu, 3 Feb 2022, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 05:15:34PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:06:33AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:01:13AM +0000, Adam Manzanares wrote:
quoted
BTW I think having the target code be able to implement simple copy without
moving data over the fabric would be a great way of showing off the command.
Do you mean this should be implemented instead as a fabrics backend
instead because fabrics already instantiates and creates a virtual
nvme device? And so this would mean less code?
It would be a lot less code. In fact I don't think we need any new code
at all. Just using nvme-loop on top of null_blk or brd should be all
that is needed.
Mikulas,
That begs the question why add this instead of using null_blk with
nvme-loop?
Luis
I think that nvme-debug (the patch 3) doesn't have to be added to the
kernel.
Nvme-debug was an old student project that was canceled. I used it because
it was very easy to add copy offload functionality to it - adding this
capability took just one function with 43 lines of code (nvme_debug_copy).
I don't know if someone is interested in continuing the development of
nvme-debug. If yes, I can continue the development, if not, we can just
drop it.
Mikulas