Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2022-01-19

Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: don't drain file system I/O on del_gendisk

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2022-01-18 08:25:12

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 05:08:23PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
We need it to have proper life times in the block layer.  Everything only
needed for file system I/O and not blk-mq specific should slowly move
from the request_queue to the gendisk and I have patches going in
that direction.  In the end only the SCSI discovery code and the case
of /dev/sg without SCSI ULP will ever do passthrough I/O purely on the
gendisk.

So I think this series is moving in the wrong direction.  If you care
about no doing two freeze cycles the right thing to do is to record
I just think that the extra draining point in del_gendisk() isn't useful,
can you share any use case with this change?
SCSI disk detach for example is a place where we need it.
quoted
if we ever did non-disk based passthrough I/O on a requeue_queue and
if not simplify the request_queue cleanup.  Doing this is on my TODO
list but I haven't look into the details yet.
quoted
1) queue freezing can't drain FS I/O for bio based driver
This is something I've started looking into it.
But that is one big problem, not sure you can solve it in short time,
also not sure if it is useful, cause FS already guaranteed that every
IO is drained before releasing disk, or IOs in the submission task are
drained when exiting the task.
Think of a hot unplug.  The device gets a removal even, but the file
system still lives on.
Firstly, FS layer has already guaranteed that every FS IO is done before
releasing disk, so no need to take so much effort and make code more
fragile to add one extra FS IO draining point in del_gendisk().
In the hot removal case the file system is still alive when del_gendisk
is called.
Also the above two things aren't trivial enough to solve in short time, so
can we delay the FS draining in del_gendisk() until the two are done?
We already have the draining.  What are you trying to fix by removing it?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help