Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: don't drain file system I/O on del_gendisk
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2022-01-18 08:25:12
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 05:08:23PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
We need it to have proper life times in the block layer. Everything only needed for file system I/O and not blk-mq specific should slowly move from the request_queue to the gendisk and I have patches going in that direction. In the end only the SCSI discovery code and the case of /dev/sg without SCSI ULP will ever do passthrough I/O purely on the gendisk. So I think this series is moving in the wrong direction. If you care about no doing two freeze cycles the right thing to do is to recordI just think that the extra draining point in del_gendisk() isn't useful, can you share any use case with this change?
SCSI disk detach for example is a place where we need it.
quoted
if we ever did non-disk based passthrough I/O on a requeue_queue and if not simplify the request_queue cleanup. Doing this is on my TODO list but I haven't look into the details yet.quoted
1) queue freezing can't drain FS I/O for bio based driverThis is something I've started looking into it.But that is one big problem, not sure you can solve it in short time, also not sure if it is useful, cause FS already guaranteed that every IO is drained before releasing disk, or IOs in the submission task are drained when exiting the task.
Think of a hot unplug. The device gets a removal even, but the file system still lives on.
Firstly, FS layer has already guaranteed that every FS IO is done before releasing disk, so no need to take so much effort and make code more fragile to add one extra FS IO draining point in del_gendisk().
In the hot removal case the file system is still alive when del_gendisk is called.
Also the above two things aren't trivial enough to solve in short time, so can we delay the FS draining in del_gendisk() until the two are done?
We already have the draining. What are you trying to fix by removing it?