Re: [PATCH 1/5] blk-crypto-fallback: properly prefix function and struct names
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-09-15 07:37:19
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-mmc, linux-scsi
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-09-15 07:37:19
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-mmc, linux-scsi
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 06:31:31PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
From: Eric Biggers <redacted> For clarity, avoid using just the "blk_crypto_" prefix for functions and structs that are specific to blk-crypto-fallback. Instead, use "blk_crypto_fallback_". Some places already did this, but others didn't. This is also a prerequisite for using "struct blk_crypto_keyslot" to mean a generic blk-crypto keyslot (which is what it sounds like). Rename the fallback one to "struct blk_crypto_fallback_keyslot". Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <redacted>
These names are pretty long, but given that there aren't all the many of them: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>