Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] nbd: convert to use blk_mq_find_and_get_req()
From: Ming Lei <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-14 14:33:40
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 05:08:00PM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
On 2021/09/14 15:46, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 03:13:38PM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:quoted
On 2021/09/14 14:44, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:11:06AM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:quoted
On 2021/09/14 9:11, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:12:55PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:quoted
blk_mq_tag_to_rq() can only ensure to return valid request in following situation: 1) client send request message to server first submit_bio ... blk_mq_get_tag ... blk_mq_get_driver_tag ... nbd_queue_rq nbd_handle_cmd nbd_send_cmd 2) client receive respond message from server recv_work nbd_read_stat blk_mq_tag_to_rq If step 1) is missing, blk_mq_tag_to_rq() will return a stale request, which might be freed. Thus convert to use blk_mq_find_and_get_req() to make sure the returned request is not freed.But NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT has been added for checking if the reply is expected, do we still need blk_mq_find_and_get_req() for covering this issue? BTW, request and its payload is pre-allocated, so there isn't real use-after-free.Hi, Ming Checking NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT relied on the request founded by tag is valid, not the other way round. nbd_read_stat req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq() cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req) mutex_lock(cmd->lock) checking NBD_CMD_INFLIGHTRequest and its payload is pre-allocated, and either req->ref or cmd->lock can serve the same purpose here. Once cmd->lock is held, you can check if the cmd is inflight or not. If it isn't inflight, just return -ENOENT. Is there any problem to handle in this way?Hi, Ming in nbd_read_stat: 1) get a request by tag first 2) get nbd_cmd by the request 3) hold cmd->lock and check if cmd is inflight If we want to check if the cmd is inflight in step 3), we have to do setp 1) and 2) first. As I explained in patch 0, blk_mq_tag_to_rq() can't make sure the returned request is not freed: nbd_read_stat blk_mq_sched_free_requests blk_mq_free_rqs blk_mq_tag_to_rq -> get rq before clear mapping blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping __free_pages -> rq is freed blk_mq_request_started -> UAFIf the above can happen, blk_mq_find_and_get_req() may not fix it too, justHi, Ming Why can't blk_mq_find_and_get_req() fix it? I can't think of any scenario that might have problem currently.
The principle behind blk_mq_find_and_get_req() is that if one request's ref is grabbed, the queue's usage counter is guaranteed to be grabbed, and this way isn't straight-forward. Yeah, it can fix the issue, but I don't think it is good to call it in fast path cause tags->lock is required.
quoted
wondering why not take the following simpler way for avoiding the UAF?diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c index 5170a630778d..dfa5cce71f66 100644 --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c@@ -795,9 +795,13 @@ static void recv_work(struct work_struct *work) work); struct nbd_device *nbd = args->nbd; struct nbd_config *config = nbd->config; + struct request_queue *q = nbd->disk->queue; struct nbd_cmd *cmd; struct request *rq; + if (!percpu_ref_tryget(&q->q_usage_counter)) + return; +We can't make sure freeze_queue is called before this, thus this approch can't fix the problem, right? nbd_read_stat blk_mq_tag_to_rq elevator_switch blk_mq_freeze_queue(q); elevator_switch_mq elevator_exit blk_mq_sched_free_requests blk_mq_request_started -> UAF
No, blk_mq_freeze_queue() waits until .q_usage_counter becomes zero, so there won't be any concurrent nbd_read_stat() during switching elevator if ->q_usage_counter is grabbed in recv_work(). Thanks, Ming