Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] nbd: convert to use blk_mq_find_and_get_req()
From: Ming Lei <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-14 06:44:59
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:11:06AM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
On 2021/09/14 9:11, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:12:55PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:quoted
blk_mq_tag_to_rq() can only ensure to return valid request in following situation: 1) client send request message to server first submit_bio ... blk_mq_get_tag ... blk_mq_get_driver_tag ... nbd_queue_rq nbd_handle_cmd nbd_send_cmd 2) client receive respond message from server recv_work nbd_read_stat blk_mq_tag_to_rq If step 1) is missing, blk_mq_tag_to_rq() will return a stale request, which might be freed. Thus convert to use blk_mq_find_and_get_req() to make sure the returned request is not freed.But NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT has been added for checking if the reply is expected, do we still need blk_mq_find_and_get_req() for covering this issue? BTW, request and its payload is pre-allocated, so there isn't real use-after-free.Hi, Ming Checking NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT relied on the request founded by tag is valid, not the other way round. nbd_read_stat req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq() cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req) mutex_lock(cmd->lock) checking NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT
Request and its payload is pre-allocated, and either req->ref or cmd->lock can serve the same purpose here. Once cmd->lock is held, you can check if the cmd is inflight or not. If it isn't inflight, just return -ENOENT. Is there any problem to handle in this way? Thanks, Ming