Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] block, bfq: do not idle if only one cgroup is activated
From: yukuai (C) <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-07 11:19:27
Also in:
lkml
From: yukuai (C) <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-07 11:19:27
Also in:
lkml
On 2021/09/07 17:10, Paolo Valente wrote:
quoted
Il giorno 2 set 2021, alle ore 15:31, yukuai (C) [off-list ref] ha scritto: On 2021/08/27 1:00, Paolo Valente wrote:quoted
Why do you make these extensive changes, while you can leave all the function unchanged and just modify the above condition to something like || bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 1 || (bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs && bfqd->num_queues_with_pending_reqs_in_root)Hi, Paolo I was thinking that if CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is enabled, there is no need to caculate smallest_weight, varied_queue_weights, and multiple_classes_busy: If we count root group into num_groups_with_pending_reqs - If num_groups_with_pending_reqs <= 1, idle is not neededUnfortunately, if active queues have different weights or belong to different classes, then idling is needed to preserve per-queue bandwidths. Thanks, Paolo
Hi, Paolo It's right, if num_groups_with_pending_reqs == 1, multiple_classes_busy should be checked, while smallest_weight and varied_queue_weights can be skipped. Thanks Kuai
.