Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 2 authors, 2021-09-15

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] block, bfq: do not idle if only one cgroup is activated

From: yukuai (C) <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-02 13:31:32
Also in: lkml

On 2021/08/27 1:00, Paolo Valente wrote:
Why do you make these extensive changes, while you can leave all the
function unchanged and just modify the above condition to something
like

|| bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 1
|| (bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs && bfqd->num_queues_with_pending_reqs_in_root)
Hi, Paolo

I was thinking that if CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is enabled, there is no
need to caculate smallest_weight, varied_queue_weights, and
multiple_classes_busy:

If we count root group into num_groups_with_pending_reqs
  - If num_groups_with_pending_reqs <= 1, idle is not needed
  - If num_groups_with_pending_reqs  > 1, idle is needed

Thus such changes can save some additional overhead.

Thanks
Yu Kuai
In addition, I still wonder whether you can simply add also the root
group to bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs (when the root group is
active).  This would make the design much cleaner.

Thanks,
Paolo
quoted
-#endif
-		;
+	return varied_queue_weights || multiple_classes_busy;
}

/*
-- 
2.31.1
.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help