Re: [PATCH v5] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space
From: Yongji Xie <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-23 04:31:35
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:17 AM Max Gurtovoy [off-list ref] wrote:
On 8/9/2021 1:16 PM, Xie Yongji wrote:quoted
An untrusted device might presents an invalid block size in configuration space. This tries to add validation for it in the validate callback and clear the VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE feature bit if the value is out of the supported range.This is not clear to me. What is untrusted device ? is it a buggy device ?
A buggy device, the devices in an encrypted VM, or a userspace device created by VDUSE [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20210818120642.165-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com/ (local)
What is the return value for the blk_size in this case that you try to override ?
The value that is larger than PAGE_SIZE. I think the block layer can not handle the block size that is larger than PAGE_SIZE correctly, e.g. in block_read_full_page().
quoted
And we also double check the value in virtblk_probe() in case that it's changed after the validation. Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <redacted> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 4b49df2dfd23..afb37aac09e8 100644 --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c@@ -692,6 +692,28 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = { static unsigned int virtblk_queue_depth; module_param_named(queue_depth, virtblk_queue_depth, uint, 0444); +static int virtblk_validate(struct virtio_device *vdev) +{ + u32 blk_size; + + if (!vdev->config->get) { + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n", + __func__); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE)) + return 0; + + blk_size = virtio_cread32(vdev, + offsetof(struct virtio_blk_config, blk_size)); + + if (blk_size < SECTOR_SIZE || blk_size > PAGE_SIZE) + __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE);is it PAGE_SIZE or SZ_4K ? Do we support a 64K blk size (PPC PAGE_SIZE)
I think PAGE_SIZE should be OK here. I didn't see a hard 4K limitation
in the kernel. NBD did the same check:
static int nbd_set_size(struct nbd_device *nbd, loff_t bytesize, loff_t blksize)
{
if (!blksize)
blksize = NBD_DEF_BLKSIZE;
if (blksize < 512 || blksize > PAGE_SIZE || !is_power_of_2(blksize))
return -EINVAL;
Thanks,
Yongji