Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2021-01-20

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] block: introduce zone_write_granularity limit

From: Damien Le Moal <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-20 11:25:28
Also in: linux-nvme, linux-scsi

On 2021/01/20 19:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:17:22PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
quoted
Per ZBC and ZAC specifications, host-managed SMR hard-disks mandate that
all writes into sequential write required zones be aligned to the device
physical block size. However, NVMe ZNS does not have this constraint and
allows write operations into sequential zones to be logical block size
aligned. This inconsistency does not help with portability of software
across device types.
To solve this, introduce the zone_write_granularity queue limit to
indicate the alignment constraint, in bytes, of write operations into
zones of a zoned block device. This new limit is exported as a
read-only sysfs queue attribute and the helper
blk_queue_zone_write_granularity() introduced for drivers to set this
limit. The scsi disk driver is modified to use this helper to set
host-managed SMR disk zone write granularity to the disk physical block
size. The nvme driver zns support use this helper to set the new limit
to the logical block size of the zoned namespace.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <redacted>
---
 Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst |  7 +++++++
 block/blk-settings.c                | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 block/blk-sysfs.c                   |  7 +++++++
 drivers/nvme/host/zns.c             |  1 +
 drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c               | 10 ++++++++++
 include/linux/blkdev.h              |  3 +++
 6 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst
index 2638d3446b79..c8bf8bc3c03a 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst
@@ -273,4 +273,11 @@ devices are described in the ZBC (Zoned Block Commands) and ZAC
 do not support zone commands, they will be treated as regular block devices
 and zoned will report "none".
 
+zone_write_granularity (RO)
+---------------------------
+This indicates the alignment constraint, in bytes, for write operations in
+sequential zones of zoned block devices (devices with a zoned attributed
+that reports "host-managed" or "host-aware"). This value is always 0 for
+regular block devices.
+
 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, February 2009
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 43990b1d148b..6be6ed9485e3 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
 	lim->io_opt = 0;
 	lim->misaligned = 0;
 	lim->zoned = BLK_ZONED_NONE;
+	lim->zone_write_granularity = 0;
I think this should default to 512 just like the logic and physical
block size.
Hmm. I wanted to keep this limit to 0 for regular devices. If we default to 512,
regular devices will see that value. They can ignore it of course, but having it
as 0 makes it clear that it should be ignored.
quoted
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_default_limits);
 
@@ -366,6 +367,31 @@ void blk_queue_physical_block_size(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int size)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_physical_block_size);
 
+/**
+ * blk_queue_zone_write_granularity - set zone write granularity for the queue
+ * @q:  the request queue for the zoned device
+ * @size:  the zone write granularity size, in bytes
+ *
+ * Description:
+ *   This should be set to the lowest possible size allowing to write in
+ *   sequential zones of a zoned block device.
+ */
+void blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(struct request_queue *q,
+				      unsigned int size)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON(!blk_queue_is_zoned(q)))
+		return;
+
+	q->limits.zone_write_granularity = size;
+
+	if (q->limits.zone_write_granularity < q->limits.logical_block_size)
+		q->limits.zone_write_granularity = q->limits.logical_block_size;
I think this should be a WARN_ON_ONCE.
OK.
quoted
+	if (q->limits.zone_write_granularity < q->limits.io_min)
+		q->limits.zone_write_granularity = q->limits.io_min;
I don't think this makes sense at all.
Arg ! Yes, that is a hint only ! I misread the comments for blk_limits_io_min().
Will remove this.
quoted
+static ssize_t queue_zone_write_granularity_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
Overly long line.
quoted
+	/*
+	 * Per ZBC and ZAC specifications, writes in sequential write required
+	 * zones of host-managed devices must be aligned to the device physical
+	 * block size.
+	 */
+	if (blk_queue_zoned_model(q) == BLK_ZONED_HM)
+		blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(q, sdkp->physical_block_size);
+	else
+		blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(q, sdkp->device->sector_size);
Do we really want to special case HA drives here?  I though we generally
either treat them as drive managed (if they have partitions) or else like
host managed ones.
If the HA drive is treated as drive-managed (i.e. it has a partition), then the
model here will be seen as BLK_ZONED_NONE and we should ignore it, or better,
set the zone_write_granularity to 0. If the drive is actually used as a zoned
drive, then we will see BLK_ZONED_HA here and we can use the logical block size
since HA drives do not have that restriction on physical block alignment.
So my code above is wrong. The else should be

else if (blk_queue_zoned_model(q) == BLK_ZONED_HA)

And I think we also need to add "q->limit.zone_write_granularity = 0" in
blk_queue_set_zoned() if model == BLK_ZONED_NONE at the end of that function.

Will send a v3 with these fixes.


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help