Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] block: introduce zone_write_granularity limit
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2021-01-20 11:24:40
Also in:
linux-nvme, linux-scsi
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:17:22PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Per ZBC and ZAC specifications, host-managed SMR hard-disks mandate that all writes into sequential write required zones be aligned to the device physical block size. However, NVMe ZNS does not have this constraint and allows write operations into sequential zones to be logical block size aligned. This inconsistency does not help with portability of software across device types. To solve this, introduce the zone_write_granularity queue limit to indicate the alignment constraint, in bytes, of write operations into zones of a zoned block device. This new limit is exported as a read-only sysfs queue attribute and the helper blk_queue_zone_write_granularity() introduced for drivers to set this limit. The scsi disk driver is modified to use this helper to set host-managed SMR disk zone write granularity to the disk physical block size. The nvme driver zns support use this helper to set the new limit to the logical block size of the zoned namespace. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <redacted> --- Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst | 7 +++++++ block/blk-settings.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block/blk-sysfs.c | 7 +++++++ drivers/nvme/host/zns.c | 1 + drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 10 ++++++++++ include/linux/blkdev.h | 3 +++ 6 files changed, 56 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst index 2638d3446b79..c8bf8bc3c03a 100644 --- a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst +++ b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst@@ -273,4 +273,11 @@ devices are described in the ZBC (Zoned Block Commands) and ZAC do not support zone commands, they will be treated as regular block devices and zoned will report "none". +zone_write_granularity (RO) +--------------------------- +This indicates the alignment constraint, in bytes, for write operations in +sequential zones of zoned block devices (devices with a zoned attributed +that reports "host-managed" or "host-aware"). This value is always 0 for +regular block devices. + Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, February 2009diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c index 43990b1d148b..6be6ed9485e3 100644 --- a/block/blk-settings.c +++ b/block/blk-settings.c@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) lim->io_opt = 0; lim->misaligned = 0; lim->zoned = BLK_ZONED_NONE; + lim->zone_write_granularity = 0;
I think this should default to 512 just like the logic and physical block size.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
} EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_default_limits);@@ -366,6 +367,31 @@ void blk_queue_physical_block_size(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int size) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_physical_block_size); +/** + * blk_queue_zone_write_granularity - set zone write granularity for the queue + * @q: the request queue for the zoned device + * @size: the zone write granularity size, in bytes + * + * Description: + * This should be set to the lowest possible size allowing to write in + * sequential zones of a zoned block device. + */ +void blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(struct request_queue *q, + unsigned int size) +{ + if (WARN_ON(!blk_queue_is_zoned(q))) + return; + + q->limits.zone_write_granularity = size; + + if (q->limits.zone_write_granularity < q->limits.logical_block_size) + q->limits.zone_write_granularity = q->limits.logical_block_size;
I think this should be a WARN_ON_ONCE.
+ if (q->limits.zone_write_granularity < q->limits.io_min) + q->limits.zone_write_granularity = q->limits.io_min;
I don't think this makes sense at all.
+static ssize_t queue_zone_write_granularity_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
Overly long line.
+ /* + * Per ZBC and ZAC specifications, writes in sequential write required + * zones of host-managed devices must be aligned to the device physical + * block size. + */ + if (blk_queue_zoned_model(q) == BLK_ZONED_HM) + blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(q, sdkp->physical_block_size); + else + blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(q, sdkp->device->sector_size);
Do we really want to special case HA drives here? I though we generally either treat them as drive managed (if they have partitions) or else like host managed ones.