[PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 04/10] s390/dasd: Remove unused parameter from dasd_generic_probe() · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] s390/dasd: Remove unused parameter from dasd_generic_probe() · Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 01/10] s390/cio: Export information about Endpoint-Security Capability · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 05/10] s390/dasd: Move duplicate code to separate function · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] s390/dasd: Move duplicate code to separate function · Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 03/10] s390/cio: Add support for FCES status notification · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 09/10] s390/dasd: Prepare for additional path event handling · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] s390/dasd: Prepare for additional path event handling · Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 10/10] s390/dasd: Process FCES path event notification · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] s390/dasd: Process FCES path event notification · Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] s390/dasd: Process FCES path event notification · Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 07/10] s390/dasd: Fix operational path inconsistency · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] s390/dasd: Fix operational path inconsistency · Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 02/10] s390/cio: Provide Endpoint-Security Mode per CU · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 08/10] s390/dasd: Display FC Endpoint Security information via sysfs · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] s390/dasd: Display FC Endpoint Security information via sysfs · Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> · 2020-10-08
[PATCH v2 06/10] s390/dasd: Store path configuration data during path handling · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] s390/dasd: Store path configuration data during path handling · Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> · 2020-10-08
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-12
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> · 2020-10-12
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-12
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> · 2020-10-13
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-10-13
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> · 2020-10-14
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-11-10
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> · 2020-11-11
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security · Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> · 2020-11-12

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security

From: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-11-10 15:52:26
Also in: linux-s390

Am 14.10.20 um 03:19 schrieb Jens Axboe:

quoted

So, instead could you please apply the patches for 5.11 as soon as it is
suitable?

I will - I have it queued up, won't create anything public until we
get past the merge window.

Sorry to bother you again with this.
Is there any outlook when you are going to push the patches to your
for-next branch?

Or shall I resend the patches?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help