Re: [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs
From: Ming Lei <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-23 00:56:34
Also in:
linux-scsi
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 08:24:39AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 6/17/20 1:26 PM, Kashyap Desai wrote:quoted
quoted
->queued is increased only and not decreased just for debug purpose so ->far, so it can't be relied for this purpose.Thanks. I overlooked that that it is only incremental counter.quoted
One approach is to add one similar counter, and maintain it byscheduler'squoted
insert/dispatch callback.I tried below and I see performance is on expected range.diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c index fdcc2c1..ea201d0 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c@@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_request(struct request *rq,bool at_head, list_add(&rq->queuelist, &list); e->type->ops.insert_requests(hctx, &list, at_head); + atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued); } else { spin_lock(&ctx->lock); __blk_mq_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head);@@ -511,8 +512,10 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_requests(structblk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, percpu_ref_get(&q->q_usage_counter); e = hctx->queue->elevator; - if (e && e->type->ops.insert_requests) + if (e && e->type->ops.insert_requests) { e->type->ops.insert_requests(hctx, list, false); + atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued); + } else { /* * try to issue requests directly if the hw queue isn'tdiff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.h b/block/blk-mq-sched.h index 126021f..946b47a 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.h +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.h@@ -74,6 +74,13 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_sched_has_work(structblk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) { struct elevator_queue *e = hctx->queue->elevator; + /* If current hctx has not queued any request, there is no need to run. + * blk_mq_run_hw_queue() on hctx which has queued IO will handle + * running specific hctx. + */ + if (!atomic_read(&hctx->elevator_queued)) + return false; + if (e && e->type->ops.has_work) return e->type->ops.has_work(hctx);diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index f73a2f9..48f1824 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c@@ -517,8 +517,10 @@ void blk_mq_free_request(struct request *rq) struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx; if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELVPRIV) { - if (e && e->type->ops.finish_request) + if (e && e->type->ops.finish_request) { e->type->ops.finish_request(rq); + atomic_dec(&hctx->elevator_queued); + } if (rq->elv.icq) { put_io_context(rq->elv.icq->ioc); rq->elv.icq = NULL;@@ -2571,6 +2573,7 @@ blk_mq_alloc_hctx(struct request_queue *q, structblk_mq_tag_set *set, goto free_hctx; atomic_set(&hctx->nr_active, 0); + atomic_set(&hctx->elevator_queued, 0); if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) node = set->numa_node; hctx->numa_node = node;diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h index 66711c7..ea1ddb1 100644 --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h@@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx { * shared across request queues. */ atomic_t nr_active; + /** + * @elevator_queued: Number of queued requests on hctx. + */ + atomic_t elevator_queued; /** @cpuhp_online: List to store request if CPU is going to die */ struct hlist_node cpuhp_online;Would it make sense to move it into the elevator itself?
That is my initial suggestion, and the counter is just done for bfq & mq-deadline, then we needn't to pay the cost for others. Thanks, Ming