Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 4 authors, 2019-01-29

Re: [PATCH 2/5] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function

From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Date: 2019-01-24 08:29:28
Also in: linux-iommu, lkml

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:27:55PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 05:30:46PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
quoted
+bool is_swiotlb_active(void)
+{
+	return !no_iotlb_memory;
+}
As I've just introduced and fixed a bug in this area in the current
cycle - I don't think no_iotlb_memory is what your want (and maybe
not useful at all): if the arch valls swiotlb_exit after previously
initializing a buffer it won't be set.  You probably want to check
for non-zero io_tlb_start and/or io_tlb_end.
Okay, but that requires that I also set io_tlb_start and friends back to
zero in the failure path of swiotlb_init(). Otherwise it could be left
non-zero in case swiotlb_init_with_tbl() returns an error.


Regards,

	Joerg
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help