Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-23 17:10:40
Also in:
linux-iommu, lkml
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 05:30:44PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi, here is the third version of this patch-set. Previous versions can be found here: V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro@8bytes.org/ (local) V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro@8bytes.org/ (local) The problem solved here is a limitation of the SWIOTLB implementation, which does not support allocations larger than 256kb. When the virtio-blk driver tries to read/write a block larger than that, the allocation of the dma-handle fails and an IO error is reported. Changes to v2 are: * Check if SWIOTLB is active before returning its limit in dma_direct_max_mapping_size() * Only apply the maximum segment limit in virtio-blk when DMA-API is used for the vring Please review. Thanks, Joerg Joerg Roedel (5): swiotlb: Introduce swiotlb_max_mapping_size() swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function dma: Introduce dma_max_mapping_size() virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size() virtio-blk: Consider virtio_max_dma_size() for maximum segment size drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 10 ++++++---- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 10 ++++++++++
The kvm-devel mailing list should have been copied on those. When you do can you please put 'Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [off-list ref]' on all of them? Thank you! P.S. Christopher, I am assuming you are OK with this idea, if so - and once the owners of 'virtio' Ack, do you want to put it in my tree? Thanks!
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ include/linux/swiotlb.h | 11 +++++++++++ include/linux/virtio.h | 2 ++ kernel/dma/direct.c | 11 +++++++++++ kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 10 ++++++++++ 7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-- 2.17.1