Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 2 authors, 2018-07-27

Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Rework blk-mq timeout handling again

From: Keith Busch <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 16:57:19

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 04:51:05PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 10:46 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:20:42AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
quoted
+	ret = req->q->mq_ops->timeout(req, reserved);
+	/*
+	 * BLK_EH_DONT_RESET_TIMER means that the block driver either
+	 * completed the request or still owns the request and will
+	 * continue processing the timeout asynchronously. In the
+	 * latter case, if blk_mq_complete_request() was called while
+	 * the timeout handler was in progress, ignore that call.
+	 */
+	if (ret == BLK_EH_DONT_RESET_TIMER)
+		return;
This is how completions get lost.
The new approach for handling completions that occur while the .timeout()
callback in progress is as follows:
* blk_mq_complete_request() executes the following code:
       if (blk_mq_change_rq_state(rq, MQ_RQ_TIMED_OUT, MQ_RQ_COMPLETE))
               return;
* blk_mq_rq_timed_out() executes the following code:
       if (blk_mq_rq_state(req) == MQ_RQ_COMPLETE) {
               __blk_mq_complete_request(req);
               return;
       }

As one can see __blk_mq_complete_request() gets called if this race occurs.
You skip that code if the driver returns BLK_EH_DONT_RESET_TIMER.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help