Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Rework blk-mq timeout handling again
From: Bart Van Assche <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 18:09:55
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 11:58 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
Instead of PATCH 1/5, how about creating a new timeout return code li=
ke
"BLK_EH_DONT_COMPLETE"?
That sounds like a good idea to me. I think this approach will avoid that w= e have to introduce a request queue flag that chooses between the behavior needed by the NVMe driver or the behavior needed by the SCSI core. Bart.