Re: general protection fault in wb_workfn (2)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2018-05-28 16:13:50
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Sun 27-05-18 09:47:54, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Forwarding http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201805251915.FGH64517.HVFJOOLFFMQStO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp . Jan Kara wrote:quoted
quoted
void delayed_work_timer_fn(struct timer_list *t) { struct delayed_work *dwork = from_timer(dwork, t, timer); /* should have been called from irqsafe timer with irq already off */ __queue_work(dwork->cpu, dwork->wq, &dwork->work); } Then, wb_workfn() is after all scheduled even if we check for WB_registered bit, isn't it?It can be queued after WB_registered bit is cleared but it cannot be queued after mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, 0) has finished. That function deletes the pending timer (the timer cannot be armed again because WB_registered is cleared) and queues what should be the last round of wb_workfn().mod_delayed_work() deletes the pending timer but does not wait for already invoked timer handler to complete because it is using del_timer() rather than del_timer_sync(). Then, what happens if __queue_work() is almost concurrently executed from two CPUs, one from mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, 0) from wb_shutdown() path (which is called without spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock)) and the other from delayed_work_timer_fn() path (which is called without checking WB_registered bit under spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock)) ?
In this case, work should still be queued only once. The synchronization in this case should be provided by the WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT. When a delayed work is queued by mod_delayed_work(), this bit is set, and gets cleared only once the work is started on some CPU. But admittedly this code is rather convoluted so I may be missing something. Also you should note that flush_delayed_work() which follows mod_delayed_work() in wb_shutdown() does del_timer_sync() so I don't see how anything could get past that. In fact mod_delayed_work() is in wb_shutdown() path to make sure wb_workfn() gets executed at least once before the bdi_writeback structure gets cleaned up so that all queued items are finished. We do not rely on it to remove pending timers or queued wb_workfn() executions. Honza -- Jan Kara [off-list ref] SUSE Labs, CR