Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 3 authors, 2018-01-08

Re: [PATCH v1 02/10] bcache: set task properly in allocator_wait()

From: Coly Li <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-05 17:11:44
Also in: linux-bcache

On 04/01/2018 1:09 AM, Michael Lyle wrote:
On 01/03/2018 06:03 AM, Coly Li wrote:
quoted
Kernel thread routine bch_allocator_thread() references macro
allocator_wait() to wait for a condition or quit to do_exit()
when kthread_should_stop() is true.

Macro allocator_wait() has 2 issues in setting task state, let's
see its code piece,

284         while (1) {                                                   \
285                 set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);                \
286                 if (cond)                                             \
287                         break;                                        \
288                                                                       \
289                 mutex_unlock(&(ca)->set->bucket_lock);                \
290                 if (kthread_should_stop())                            \
291                         return 0;                                     \
292                                                                       \
293                 schedule();                                           \
294                 mutex_lock(&(ca)->set->bucket_lock);                  \
295         }                                                             \
296         __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);                            \

1) At line 285, task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, if at line 290
kthread_should_stop() is true, the kernel thread will terminate and return
to kernel/kthread.s:kthread(), then calls do_exit() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
state. This is not a suggested behavior and a warning message will be
reported by might_sleep() in do_exit() code path: "WARNING: do not call
blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [xxxx]".

2) Because task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE at line 285, when break
while-loop the task state has to be set back to TASK_RUNNING at line 296.
Indeed it is unncessary, if task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before
calling schedule() at line 293, we don't need to set the state back to
TASK_RUNNING at line 296 anymore. The reason is, allocator kthread is only
woken up by wake_up_process(), this routine makes sure the task state of
allocator kthread will be TASK_RUNNING after it returns from schedule() at
line 294 (see kernel/sched/core.c:try_to_wake_up() for more detailed
information).

This patch fixes the above 2 issues by,
1) Setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state just before calling schedule().
2) Then setting TASK_RUNNING at line 296 is unnecessary, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li <redacted>
Hi Mike,

I also feel I made mistake here. set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
must be called before the condition check, other wise there will be a
race window on task state setting. A correct fix should be setting task
state to TASK_RUNNING before calling 'return 0', or before calling
mutex_unlock(&(ca)->set->bucket_lock).

When I review the new closure_sync() patches, I feel I make mistake
here. It will be fixed in v2 patch set.

Thanks.

Coly Li
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help