Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 4 authors, 2017-10-17

Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] blk-mq: introduce .get_budget and .put_budget in blk_mq_ops

From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date: 2017-10-17 06:38:06
Also in: linux-scsi, lkml

On 10/17/2017 03:29 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
quoted
On 10/13/2017 07:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:08:52PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 00:45 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 00:07 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
Actually it is in hot path, for example, lpfc and qla2xx's queue depth is 3,
Sorry but I doubt whether that is correct. More in general, I don't know any modern
storage HBA for which the default queue depth is so low.
You can grep:

[ming@ming linux]$ git grep -n cmd_per_lun ./drivers/scsi/ | grep -E "qla2xxx|lpfc"
Such a low queue depth will result in suboptimal performance for adapters
that communicate over a storage network. I think that's a bug and that both
adapters support much higher cmd_per_lun values.

(+James Smart)

James, can you explain us why commit 445cf4f4d2aa decreased LPFC_CMD_PER_LUN
from 30 to 3? Was that perhaps a workaround for a bug in a specific target
implementation?

(+Himanshu Madhani)

Himanshu, do you perhaps know whether it is safe to increase cmd_per_lun for
the qla2xxx initiator driver to the scsi_host->can_queue value?
->can_queue is size of the whole tag space shared by all LUNs, looks it isn't
reasonable to increase cmd_per_lun to .can_queue.
'3' is just a starting point; later on it'll be adjusted via
scsi_change_depth().
Looks like it's not working correctly with blk-mq, though.
At default, in scsi_alloc_sdev(), q->queue_depth is set as
host->cmd_per_lun. You are right, q->queue_depth can be adjusted
later too.

q->queue_depth is respected in scsi_dev_queue_ready().
.cmd_per_lun defines the max outstanding cmds for each lun, I
guess it is respected by some hardware inside.
No, this is purely a linux abstraction. Nothing to do with the hardware.
For example, I remembered that on lpfc q->queue_depth is 30 because
the default 'lpfc_lun_queue_depth' is 30. And its .cmd_per_lun is 3.
Per my observation, this .cmd_per_lun limit is still workable.
Again, these are just some pre-defined values to avoid I/O starvation
when having several LUNs. _if_ we can guarantee I/O fairness between
several (hundreds!) devices all sharing the same tagspace we wouldn't
need these variables.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help