Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2017-09-21

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] blk-mq: fix nr_requests wrong value when modify it from sysfs

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2017-09-21 16:37:48

On 09/21/2017 09:17 AM, weiping zhang wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
if blk-mq use "none" io scheduler, nr_request get a wrong value when
input a number > tag_set->queue_depth. blk_mq_tag_update_depth will get
the smaller one min(nr, set->queue_depth), and then q->nr_request get a
wrong value.

Reproduce:

echo none > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/ioscheduler
echo 1000000 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/nr_requests
cat /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/nr_requests
1000000

Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <redacted>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 98a1860..479c35a 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2642,8 +2642,12 @@ int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr)
 		 * queue depth. This is similar to what the old code would do.
 		 */
 		if (!hctx->sched_tags) {
-			ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx, &hctx->tags,
-							min(nr, set->queue_depth),
+			if (nr > set->queue_depth) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				break;
+			}
+
+			ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx, &hctx->tags, nr,
 							false);
What am I missing here? blk_mq_tag_update_depth() should already return
-EINVAL for the case where we can't grow the tags. Looks like this patch
should simply remove the min(nr, set->queue_depth) and just pass in 'nr'.
Should not need the duplicated check for depth.

-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help