Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 2 authors, 2017-06-06

Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] blk-mq: fix direct issue

From: Bart Van Assche <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-05 21:25:33

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 23:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static void __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+					struct request *rq,
+					blk_qc_t *cookie, bool may_sleep)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q =3D rq->q;
 	struct blk_mq_queue_data bd =3D {
 		.rq =3D rq,
 		.last =3D true,
 	};
-	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
 	blk_qc_t new_cookie;
 	int ret;
+	bool run_queue =3D true;
+
+	if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx)) {
+		run_queue =3D false;
+		goto insert;
+	}
=20
 	if (q->elevator)
 		goto insert;
=20
-	if (!blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, &hctx, false))
+	if (!blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, NULL, false))
 		goto insert;
=20
 	new_cookie =3D request_to_qc_t(hctx, rq);
@@ -1439,7 +1445,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct requ=
est *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
=20
 	__blk_mq_requeue_request(rq);
 insert:
-	blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, true, false, may_sleep);
+	blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, run_queue, false, may_sleep);
 }
=20
 static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
@@ -1447,7 +1453,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq=
_hw_ctx *hctx,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 {
 	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
 		rcu_read_lock();
-		__blk_mq_try_issue_directly(rq, cookie, false);
+		__blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	} else {
 		unsigned int srcu_idx;
@@ -1455,7 +1461,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq=
_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		might_sleep();
=20
 		srcu_idx =3D srcu_read_lock(&hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
-		__blk_mq_try_issue_directly(rq, cookie, true);
+		__blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, true);
 		srcu_read_unlock(&hctx->queue_rq_srcu, srcu_idx);
 	}
 }
Hello Ming,

It seems like you are assuming that the hardware queue of the rq argument
passed to __blk_mq_try_issue_directly() matches the hctx argument? Sorry
but I think that's an incorrect assumption. Please have a look at the
following code in blk_mq_make_request():

		if (same_queue_rq)
			blk_mq_try_issue_directly(data.hctx, same_queue_rq,
					&cookie);

Bart.=
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help