On 03/28/2017 01:38 PM, Stephen Bates wrote:
quoted
quoted
In order to bucket IO for the polling algorithm we use a sysfs entry
to set the filter value. It is signed and we will use that as follows:
0 : No filtering. All IO are considered in stat generation
> 0 : Filtering based on IO of exactly this size only.
< 0 : Filtering based on IO less than or equal to -1 time this value.>
I'd say that this is a fairly non-trivial semantic meanning to this...
Is there any use for the size exact match filter? If not then
I suggest we always make it (<=) in its semantics...
Thanks for the review Sagi. I�d be OK going with <=0 as the exact
match would normally be for minimal IO sizes (where <= and = are the
same thing). I will see what other feedback I get and aim to do a
respin soon�
No tunables for this, please. There's absolutely no reason why we should
need it.
--
Jens Axboe